Taxation of Digital Services in Kenya: Overview and Compliance Requirements
How Kenya taxes digital services: Significant Economic Presence Tax, VAT on digital marketplace supplies, who must register and how to stay compliant with KRA.
Read article
Money laundering threatens the integrity of Kenya's financial system and its reputation as a regional financial hub. In February 2024, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) placed Kenya on its list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring, commonly called the "grey list". Since then, regulators have intensified supervision and enforcement. For banks, microfinance institutions, Saccos, insurers, payment service providers, investment firms and other reporting institutions, a strong anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CFT) programme is now essential. This guide explains the legal framework and the core compliance obligations.
| Law or body | Role |
|---|---|
| Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2009 | Creates money laundering offences, reporting obligations and the Financial Reporting Centre; provides for asset recovery |
| Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Regulations | Detailed rules on customer due diligence, record keeping and reporting |
| Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2012 | Criminalises terrorism financing and provides for freezing of terrorist assets and implementation of UN sanctions |
| Anti-Money Laundering and Combating of Terrorism Financing Laws (Amendment) Act, 2023 | Strengthened the framework ahead of the FATF review, expanded reporting institutions and enhanced beneficial ownership rules |
| Financial Reporting Centre (FRC) | Kenya's financial intelligence unit; receives and analyses reports and supervises institutions without another AML supervisor |
| Assets Recovery Agency | Pursues civil forfeiture of proceeds of crime |
| Sector supervisors | The Central Bank of Kenya, Capital Markets Authority, Insurance Regulatory Authority, Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority and others supervise AML compliance in their sectors |
POCAMLA makes it an offence to engage in transactions involving property that a person knows or ought reasonably to have known is the proceeds of crime, including concealing, disguising, acquiring, using or possessing such property. It is also an offence to assist another person to launder money and to fail to report suspicious activity. Importantly, the "ought reasonably to have known" standard means that wilful blindness is not a defence.
Institutions must identify and assess the money laundering and terrorism financing risks they face, considering their customers, products, delivery channels and geographic exposure. The assessment should reflect Kenya's National Risk Assessment and be approved by the board.
Transactions must be monitored to ensure they are consistent with what the institution knows about the customer. Automated monitoring systems should be calibrated to the institution's risk profile, and alerts must be reviewed and documented.
Customer identification records and transaction records must be kept for at least seven years and be available to the FRC and supervisors on request.
Institutions must screen customers and transactions against United Nations Security Council sanctions lists and domestic designations, and freeze assets of designated persons without delay.
POCAMLA provides serious penalties. A person convicted of a money laundering offence may face imprisonment of up to 14 years, a fine of up to KES 5 million, or both, while a body corporate may be fined up to KES 25 million or the amount of the value of the property involved, whichever is higher. Failure to comply with reporting and other obligations also attracts fines and imprisonment for responsible officers. Separately, the Central Bank of Kenya and other supervisors can impose monetary penalties, restrict activities and take action against directors and senior managers.
Grey listing increases scrutiny from foreign correspondent banks, investors and regulators. Kenyan institutions can expect more questions about their AML controls in cross-border relationships, closer supervision at home, and pressure to demonstrate effective, not just paper, compliance. Kenya has committed to an action plan with FATF, and the reforms that follow will continue to raise the bar for reporting institutions.
Reporting institutions include banks, microfinance institutions, Saccos, insurers, payment service providers, forex bureaus, capital markets intermediaries and designated non-financial businesses and professions such as real estate agents, casinos, dealers in precious metals, accountants and, for specified activities, advocates. Virtual asset service providers have also been brought into scope.
No. Disclosing that a report has been made, or is being considered, is the offence of tipping off.
We advise financial institutions and fintechs on AML/CFT programme design, regulatory inspections, investigations and enforcement proceedings. Contact our banking and compliance team, and read our related guides on banking law in Kenya and cryptocurrency regulation.
Clear, practical legal counsel for people and businesses in Kenya. This article is general information, not legal advice. For advice on your situation, speak to one of our advocates.
Talk to an advocate
Technology Law
How Kenya taxes digital services: Significant Economic Presence Tax, VAT on digital marketplace supplies, who must register and how to stay compliant with KRA.
Read article
Risk & Compliance
A practical guide to Kenya's Climate Change Act 2016 and 2023 amendments: institutions, carbon markets, benefit sharing and what businesses must do to comply.
Read article
Technology Law
How Kenyan law applies to AI today: data protection, automated decisions, IP, liability and the National AI Strategy, plus a practical compliance checklist.
Read article